Change and contradiction: a criticism of the Hegelian account of motion

Emiliano Boccardi [1]



In his In Contradiction (1987), Priest levelled three powerful arguments against the received Russellian view of change and motion. He argued that his preferred paraconsistent theory of change, the Hegelian account, is immune from these objections. Here Iargue that these three arguments are sound, but that the Hegelian account falls pray to them too. I conclude, however, that the Hegelian account is in a better position to tackle these challenges.

[1] Department of Philosophy, Universidade Federal da Bahia.

Questa voce è stata pubblicata in Hegeliana e contrassegnata con , , , , . Contrassegna il permalink.